The Chaos Theory
Page 1 of 1
The Chaos Theory
Darcy Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:02 pm
There are those who set out to make the world a better place and then there are the select few who only exist to bring chaos to the people of the world. It is these individuals who believe that they must take it upon themselves to bestow anarchy -- brutal and belligerent -- upon those they see fit.
There is no rationality, no sense behind it, they just do.
It is a vicious cycle in which insanity and violence mesh into one consistent reality and the only ones who make it out alive are the people who live without rules. Without boundaries. Because in the end, the rules we set for ourselves are the weaknesses that bring us to our knees.
There is no rationality, no sense behind it, they just do.
It is a vicious cycle in which insanity and violence mesh into one consistent reality and the only ones who make it out alive are the people who live without rules. Without boundaries. Because in the end, the rules we set for ourselves are the weaknesses that bring us to our knees.
Darcy- The Untamed Runner.
- Posts : 47
Points : 85
Join date : 2010-01-06
Age : 125
Location : Utopia.
Re: The Chaos Theory
Guest Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:02 pm
Based on that theory (chaos theory) we can see several things:
It is true that there is an unstable system formed by two subsystems: those who build and those who destroy. Yin and Yan. Evil and Goodness? Darkness and Light? (whatever)
The theory says that that is the only way to reach equilibrium. But we must not forget two variables:
1 - The balance of the system will depend on the initial conditions of it: that is that these subsystems interact to achieve a balance according to the way the present facts are shown at the beginning.
2 - A slight variation in either of the two subsystems will do everything to change.
And there's the rub: if we think about our society, these two subsystems coexist because someone has put the inicial conditions. Our very society was condicioned by the initial element: the system.
But it gets very interesting if we think that a slight variation can completely disrupt this balance (chaos) until it reaches a new equilibrium.
If any of our social subsystems initiates an alternative, a change, new rules, etc that change will be not only a possibility but inevitably.
Is up to us.
THEY've put the inicial condictions...but WE can decide when to broke the balance to start a new equilibrium.
It is true that there is an unstable system formed by two subsystems: those who build and those who destroy. Yin and Yan. Evil and Goodness? Darkness and Light? (whatever)
The theory says that that is the only way to reach equilibrium. But we must not forget two variables:
1 - The balance of the system will depend on the initial conditions of it: that is that these subsystems interact to achieve a balance according to the way the present facts are shown at the beginning.
2 - A slight variation in either of the two subsystems will do everything to change.
And there's the rub: if we think about our society, these two subsystems coexist because someone has put the inicial conditions. Our very society was condicioned by the initial element: the system.
But it gets very interesting if we think that a slight variation can completely disrupt this balance (chaos) until it reaches a new equilibrium.
If any of our social subsystems initiates an alternative, a change, new rules, etc that change will be not only a possibility but inevitably.
Is up to us.
THEY've put the inicial condictions...but WE can decide when to broke the balance to start a new equilibrium.
Guest- Guest
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|